This will be rendered on an even smaller scale on devices, but
400dp x 400dp was simply too big and could cause performance issues.
Signed-off-by: Harsh Shandilya <me@msfjarvis.dev>
Kotlin has been building a new JVM backend for a while now
and it is finally in Beta, scheduled to hit stable in Kotlin 1.4.50.
This is the time to enable it and report any bugs we hit, before it
becomes the default.
Signed-off-by: Harsh Shandilya <me@msfjarvis.dev>
Some folks use chromebooks, which don't have rear cameras.
Reported-by: Jay Tuley <jay.tuley@ekonbenefits.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
If we're horizontally scrolling, it makes sense to fill rows before
columns. But if it all fits in one page and we don't need to scroll
horizontally, it looks ridiculous. So, in this case, rearrange the tiles
so that it appears to fill columns before rows. But we don't want things
suddenly jumping around, so actually, keep the same ordering as
rows-before-columns, but add invisible spaces after certain items, so
that the fill area makes it look as though it's columns-before-rows.
This winds up being much more visually pleasing.
We do this by figuring out this kind of transformation:
If we convert this matrix:
0 3 6
1 4 _
2 5 _
To this one:
0 2 4 6
1 3 5 _
_ _ _ _
For a given index, how many spaces are under it? This changes depending
on how many total are in a grid. Going from 3x3 to 4x3, for example, we
have:
count == 12, index =
count == 11, index = 10
count == 10, index = 7,9
count == 9, index = 4,6,8
count == 8, index = 1,3,5,7
count == 7, index = 1,3,5,6!
count == 6, index = 1,3,4!,5!
count == 5, index = 1,2!,3!,4!
count == 4, index = 0!,1!,2!,3!
count == 3, index = 0!,1!,2!
count == 2, index = 0!,1!
count == 1, index = 0!
count == 0, index =
The '!' means two blanks below, no '!' means one blank below, and no
mention means no blanks below.
This commit adds code to compute such a table on the fly.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Fragment scopes get cancelled when the fragment goes away, but we don't
actually want to cancel an in-flight transition in that case. Also,
before when the fragment would cancel, there'd be an exception, and the
exception handler would call Fragment::getString, which in turn called
requireContext, which caused an exception. Work around this by using the
`activity ?: Application.get()` idiom to always have a context for
strings and toasts.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
This is kind of ridiculous, since the items own state should clearly be
queryable, but it doesn't appear to be the case here, so just shuffle it
around into kotlin and back.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
java.lang.IllegalStateException:
at android.app.ContextImpl.startServiceCommon (ContextImpl.java:1720)
at android.app.ContextImpl.startService (ContextImpl.java:1675)
at android.content.ContextWrapper.startService (ContextWrapper.java:669)
at com.wireguard.android.backend.GoBackend.startVpnService (GoBackend.java:4)
at com.wireguard.android.backend.GoBackend.setStateInternal (GoBackend.java:4)
at com.wireguard.android.backend.GoBackend.setState (GoBackend.java:2)
at com.wireguard.android.model.TunnelManager$setTunnelState$2$1.invokeSuspend (TunnelManager.java:6)
at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith (BaseContinuationImpl.java:2)
at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run (DispatchedTask.java:2)
at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler.runSafely (CoroutineScheduler.java)
at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.executeTask (CoroutineScheduler.java:7)
at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.runWorker (CoroutineScheduler.java:7)
at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.run (CoroutineScheduler.java:7)
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
java.lang.IllegalStateException:
at androidx.fragment.app.Fragment.requireContext (Fragment.java:17)
at com.wireguard.android.fragment.BaseFragment$setTunnelStateWithPermissionsResult$1.invokeSuspend (BaseFragment.java:4)
at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith (BaseContinuationImpl.java:2)
at kotlinx.coroutines.UndispatchedCoroutine.afterResume (UndispatchedCoroutine.java:19)
at kotlinx.coroutines.AbstractCoroutine.resumeWith (AbstractCoroutine.java:13)
at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith (BaseContinuationImpl.java:2)
at kotlinx.coroutines.UndispatchedCoroutine.afterResume (UndispatchedCoroutine.java:19)
at kotlinx.coroutines.AbstractCoroutine.resumeWith (AbstractCoroutine.java:13)
at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith (BaseContinuationImpl.java:2)
at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run (DispatchedTask.java:2)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback (Handler.java:790)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage (Handler.java:99)
at android.os.Looper.loop (Looper.java:164)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main (ActivityThread.java:7025)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke (Method.java)
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run (RuntimeInit.java:441)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main (ZygoteInit.java:1408)
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
GlobalScope has numerous problems[1] that make it unfit for
use in most applications and making it behave correctly requires
an excessive amount of verbosity that's alleviated simply by using
any other scope. Since we run multiple operations in the context
of the application's lifecycle, introduce a new scope that is created
when our application is, and cancelled upon its termination.
While at it, make the scope default to Dispatchers.IO to reduce pressure
on the UI event loop. Tasks requiring access to the UI thread appropriately
switch context making the change completely safe.
1: https://medium.com/@elizarov/the-reason-to-avoid-globalscope-835337445abc
Signed-off-by: Harsh Shandilya <me@msfjarvis.dev>
onSelectedTunnelChanged is already queueing us to Dispatchers.Main
(rather than Dispatchers.Main.immediate, which would crash, but why?),
so avoid the extra trip through the event loop by toggling the selected
tunnel right away.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
- Mark WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE as unused above API 29 since we defer to Storage Access Framework on P and above
- Adds a <queries> tag to allow listing apps for exclusion/inclusion dialog
Signed-off-by: Harsh Shandilya <me@msfjarvis.dev>
Setting the correct value for the allowedAuthenticators field lets the library correctly detect this by itself as verified on an API 21 emulator
Signed-off-by: Harsh Shandilya <me@msfjarvis.dev>
Google recommends all dependencies with -ktx variants depend on them directly since they transitively pull in the main artifacts and offer extensions for better usage from Kotlin
Signed-off-by: Harsh Shandilya <me@msfjarvis.dev>
Layouts in differing configurations must agree on their root tags, so we give
both copies of main_activity the same root ID, and adjust the check for
two-pane layout to simply test for nullability. This also changes the inset
dispatch code to use ViewCompat and WindowInsetsCompat since they will adjust
insets based on the SDK level allowing us to abstract away that concern.
Signed-off-by: Harsh Shandilya <me@msfjarvis.dev>
The status bar color had a subtle transparency applied which caused
inconsistencies, and the navigation bar color was the wrong shade of
gray.
Reported-by: Danny Lin <danny@kdrag0n.dev>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Shandilya <me@msfjarvis.dev>
While Play Console correctly manages to deobfuscate stacktraces using the
ProGuard mapping, it makes user recorded logs useless which is rather
undesirable.
Signed-off-by: Harsh Shandilya <me@msfjarvis.dev>
The stats might become null between these two checks, when a tunnel
flips off, resulting in a null pointer dereference:
at com.wireguard.android.model.ObservableTunnel.getStatisticsAsync (ObservableTunnel.java:103)
at com.wireguard.android.fragment.TunnelDetailFragment.updateStats (TunnelDetailFragment.java:108)
at com.wireguard.android.fragment.TunnelDetailFragment.access$updateStats (TunnelDetailFragment.java:27)
at com.wireguard.android.fragment.TunnelDetailFragment$onResume$1.run (TunnelDetailFragment.java:74)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop (TimerThread.java:562)
at java.util.TimerThread.run (TimerThread.java:512)
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
When tunnel deletion is triggered we don't bother with animation theatrics
because the resulting Snackbar needs this fab to be its anchor, which it can't
do if its outside the screen or busy animating.
Signed-off-by: Harsh Shandilya <me@msfjarvis.dev>
Long press a tunnel item. SIGKILL the app. Reenter it. Boom:
kotlin.KotlinNullPointerException:
at com.wireguard.android.fragment.TunnelListFragment$ActionModeListener.onCreateActionMode (TunnelListFragment.java:347)
at androidx.appcompat.app.AppCompatDelegateImpl$ActionModeCallbackWrapperV9.onCreateActionMode (AppCompatDelegateImpl.java:2442)
at androidx.appcompat.app.WindowDecorActionBar$ActionModeImpl.dispatchOnCreate (WindowDecorActionBar.java:1062)
at androidx.appcompat.app.WindowDecorActionBar.startActionMode (WindowDecorActionBar.java:530)
at androidx.appcompat.app.AppCompatDelegateImpl.startSupportActionMode (AppCompatDelegateImpl.java:1055)
at androidx.appcompat.app.AppCompatActivity.startSupportActionMode (AppCompatActivity.java:316)
at com.wireguard.android.fragment.TunnelListFragment$ActionModeListener.setItemChecked (TunnelListFragment.java:371)
at com.wireguard.android.fragment.TunnelListFragment.onActivityCreated (TunnelListFragment.java:174)
at androidx.fragment.app.Fragment.performActivityCreated (Fragment.java:2717)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentStateManager.activityCreated (FragmentStateManager.java:346)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManager.moveToState (FragmentManager.java:1188)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManager.moveToState (FragmentManager.java:161)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManager.moveToState (FragmentManager.java:1356)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManager.moveToState (FragmentManager.java:5)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManager.moveFragmentToExpectedState (FragmentManager.java:1434)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManager.moveFragmentToExpectedState (FragmentManager.java:5)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManager.moveToState (FragmentManager.java:1497)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManager.moveToState (FragmentManager.java:389)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManager.dispatchStateChange (FragmentManager.java:2625)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManager.dispatchStateChange (FragmentManager.java:677)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManager.dispatchActivityCreated (FragmentManager.java:2577)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManager.dispatchActivityCreated (FragmentManager.java:9)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentController.dispatchActivityCreated (FragmentController.java:247)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentActivity.onStart (FragmentActivity.java:541)
at androidx.appcompat.app.AppCompatActivity.onStart (AppCompatActivity.java:201)
at android.app.Instrumentation.callActivityOnStart (Instrumentation.java:1440)
at android.app.Activity.performStart (Activity.java:8109)
at android.app.ActivityThread.handleStartActivity (ActivityThread.java:3806)
at android.app.servertransaction.TransactionExecutor.performLifecycleSequence (TransactionExecutor.java:235)
at android.app.servertransaction.TransactionExecutor.cycleToPath (TransactionExecutor.java:215)
at android.app.servertransaction.TransactionExecutor.executeLifecycleState (TransactionExecutor.java:187)
at android.app.servertransaction.TransactionExecutor.execute (TransactionExecutor.java:105)
at android.app.ActivityThread$H.handleMessage (ActivityThread.java:2386)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage (Handler.java:107)
at android.os.Looper.loop (Looper.java:213)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main (ActivityThread.java:8178)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke (Method.java)
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run (RuntimeInit.java:513)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main (ZygoteInit.java:1101)
This commit avoids the crash. But it's not clear to me that this is
really the right solution. However, in testing it appears to work.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
When biometric hardware is available, it will be used to authenticate
the user before private keys are shown on screen or when zip exports
are executed.
Signed-off-by: Harsh Shandilya <me@msfjarvis.dev>
The tunnel/ module still uses it and exposes it as an "api", but nothing
inside of ui/ should be using it now.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
The correct way to retrieve the value inside a getter/setter is to use `field` to ensure
you don't invoke the getter while inside the getter and trigger a stack overflow
Signed-off-by: Harsh Shandilya <me@msfjarvis.dev>
